Efficient infringement abuse of valid patents clearly warrants front page coverage once exclusively afforded to PR-created patent trolls. Today’s WSJ shows that infringer lobby PR flaks will not gently shift their distracting emphasis on patent trolls. WSJ’s Ruth Simon, whose decade-long congressional coverage of patent reform is thorough, but consistently reflects the anti-patent lobby’s spin, reveals that her carefully-cultivated anti patent source relationships are still alive and well. Continue reading Troll Meme Responds To Efficient Infringement
November 8th approaches. A reader asked us what to say if allowed only minutes to efficiently describe her university’s concerns regarding pending (and assuredly future) patent litigation “reform”.
The key is to avoid discussing arcane patent law and trolls, a term used effectively in the past by proponents, but recently deemed “unhelpful” by the FTC. Trolls now are curbed by pleading reforms, state and federal laws regarding unfair practices, and expanded judicial discretion regarding willfulness and cost-shifting. Continue reading Efficient Infringement In A Nutshell
The Quinn-Keller dialogue below is must reading. Today’s patent problem isn’t patent trolls. It is the diminishing availability of infringement damages after efficient infringement. In the case of IT hardware companies like Apple, in a post IPR environment efficient infringement is virtually inevitable. In a post HR 9 business environment it will become virtually mandated. Continue reading Efficient Infringement’s Consequences Are Mostly Unavailable